He that spares the bad injures the good - Thomas Fuller
As I read A C Grayling's The Meaning of Things: Applying Philosophy to Life, I have come to realise that everyday concepts such as mercy, courage, death, sorrow, among many others, are actually very profound concepts. Having scoffed at philosophy, how dense and block-headed I am, as a subject for people living in their own 'airy-fairy' worlds, Grayling’s book has given me a hint of what philosophy is about and how it can relate to daily-life concepts.
Before Grayling's book, Jostein Gardner’s Sophie's World was the only other book which I have read on, or about, philosophy. In the strictest sense, Gardner's work is more of an fiction offering since the premise of the novel is about using a story, and a very good one at that, to teach the reader about, the somewhat misunderstood, subject of philosophy. On the other hand, Grayling's work comes across as more mainstream in that it explores the meaning of everyday concepts through a philosopher's looking glass.
Written in a easy to read, yet thought evoking style, Meaning of Things is a gift to the layman, like me, hoping to understand what philosophy is all about. For neandarthals like myself, it represets the first flicker of flame that has just engulfed the tinder of the mind's campfire. I remember someone telling me once that "Darkness is the absence of light". I am so glad that there's finally a glimmer of light shedding some meaning on the life I am living.
One theme or chapter which caught my eye was the one on Mercy.
According to the Collins English Dictionary for Advanced Learners, the meaning of mercy is "… if someone in authority shows mercy, they choose not to harm someone they have power over, or they forgive someone they have the right to punish".
Having been brought up learning the importance of justice, fairness and equity, mercy did not feature high in my list of values or virtues. You can hear me saying "That guy deserves to be hanged for so-and-so (usually murder, or some other heinous infractions) crime". My black and white view of justice allows for little or no mercy for "evil-doers". If a person breaks the law, that person should know the consequences. The person’s right to clemency has been revoked upon the commission of the act.
Sometimes I am left bewildered by the light, which to me is - strange, sentencing meted out by our judges on criminals who deserved harsher punishment. Despite the explanations, I find it hard that anything can be highlighted as reasons for mitigation in view of the crime committed. A deep sense of indignation and disappointment would wash over me whenever a criminal manages to reduce the original sentencing to a lighter punishment. "Why are these people let off so lightly? This ain’t fair. They deserved to be punished." Thoughts like these will run through my mind.
The a-ha, or the 7-Habit perspective changing moment, came when I read Grayling’s take on mercy. He explained that while mercy is prompted by sympathy and compassion, it is not those virtues per se. The meaning of mercy is close to its dictionary meaning. I guess my understanding of mercy has been mixed up with the word merciful, a word which appears regularly in all mainstream religions.
According to the same dictionary, merciful means "if you describe God or a person in a position of authority as merciful, you mean that they show kindness and forgiveness to people".
Note the similarity in both the meanings of mercy and merciful in the dictionary. Somewhat alike, yet fundamentally different. Grayling’s was able to show the subtle difference between being merciful, with its attendant emphasis on kindness and forgiveness, and mercy, which is simply the act of withholding the punishment from a person who is deserving of it. With this, I understood that our view of this virtue is very much shaped by the religious context, whether Christian, Buddhist or Islamic, which we live in. Ingrid's teachings on ethics seem to resurface again.
The simple two page discussion of mercy in Grayling’s book opened my eyes to my oft self-perceived lack of mercy. Often seeing myself as a cold-hearted, "black or white", person, I realised that I can be merciful at times. Merciful not in the divine way, but in the way I handled people in life.
Upon reflection, an activity which I am rather poor in, I realised that I can actually be quite a merciful person contrary to popular belief that i'm usually cold and heartless. As I recall all the times when I was in a position to punish a person for a poor piece of work or lousy attitude at work, I would always give the person a second, and sometimes a third or fourth chance. A mix of empathy, sympathy and a light dose of kindness are the elements which shaped my decision(s) to be "merciful".
Mercy is also evident in our daily life. We are shown mercy by people in positions of authority, be it bosses, parents, relatives, government officials, everyday. We may not see it as such, but mercy has been shown. The same reasoning applies to the so-called ‘nasty’ bosses when they stick by the book and over-punish us for minor infractions. Basically, these people have chosen not to show us mercy. Instead, these people are actually cruel. As Grayling puts it, "To punish a malefactor more severely than he deserves is cruel".
The world just needs a little more love, and mercy too.